τ

UNNS Laboratory v0.9.2

Reliability & Structural Diagnostics Layer

The first τ-Field Laboratory capable of evaluating not only molecular spectra,
but its own predictions — introducing the Quality Geometry layer.

Research Preview UNNS Lab τ-Field Geometry

Abstract. UNNS Laboratory v0.9.2 introduces a new layer of scientific analysis: Quality Geometry, the first diagnostic framework able to distinguish between τ-field structural adequacy, dataset precision, and manifold-level reliability. This is not a minor revision of v0.9.1 — it marks the transition from a matching engine to a τ-Field diagnostic instrument, enabling molecule-independent comparison, structural confidence scoring, and the first unified τ-reliability index.

1. Why v0.9.2 Is Not “Just an Update”

Previous versions of the UNNS Laboratory performed increasingly sophisticated matching between τ-field curvature microstructure and real molecular spectra. Yet all evaluations were descriptive: they measured how well the projection aligned with experiment.

Version v0.9.2 adds a fundamentally new layer: the ability for the Lab to evaluate itself.

  • It can distinguish whether χ² inflation comes from noisy data or structural mismatch.
  • It can detect curvature–residual dependencies (κ).
  • It can score the reliability of each manifold independently.
  • It can predict outliers before they occur.

These capabilities transform the Lab from a matching pipeline into a field-theoretic diagnostic system — the first step toward a calibration-ready UNNS framework.

For a better view, click here!

2. The New Quality Geometry Layer

The core innovation of v0.9.2 is a set of structural metrics that analyze the τ-field fit beyond simple χ² scoring.

2.1 Structural vs Experimental χ²

v0.9.2 separates two previously conflated quantities:

  • χ²norm — How well the τ-field explains the structure.
  • χ²σ-weighted — How precise the dataset is.
Structural ↔ Experimental χ² χ²ₙₒᵣₘ — τ-structure adequacy χ²σ — dataset precision

2.2 Curvature–Residual Coherence (κ)

κ measures how strongly τ-curvature predicts residual deviation. High κ indicates underfitting or structural conflict.

Curvature–Residual Coherence (κ) κ

2.3 Manifold Reliability R

Each manifold receives a reliability score:

R = exp( − κ · (χ²norm / 20) )

Reliability Landscape R

2.4 Unified τ-Reliability τR

The global reliability of the experiment is the mean reliability of all manifolds:

τR = mean(Rmanifold)

2.5 Expected Outliers (ΣP)

For each residual Δfi we compute:

Pi = 1 − exp( −(|Δfi| / 20)² )

Summing all Pi yields an expected outlier count — a statistical forecast of anomalies.

3. Why v0.9.2 Matters for the UNNS Substrate

These new metrics have major consequences:

  • First cross-molecule comparability via a unified τ-Reliability scale.
  • Ability to diagnose structural mismatches independent of data quality.
  • A foundation for future τ-calibration and hyperfine-field extraction.
  • Preparation for the v1.0 milestone.

In short: v0.9.2 makes the Laboratory scientifically aware of itself.

4. Relation to v0.9.1

UNNS Lab v0.9.2 preserves:

  • All matching logic from v0.6.0.
  • The v0.9.1 nonlinear τ-projection polynomial.
  • The v0.9 manifold hyperfine solver.
  • The UI and data ingestion pipeline.

No mechanics were changed — only extended. All quality metrics are additive and non-intrusive.

5. Availability

The v0.9.2 Laboratory interface is provided as:

  • unns_lab_v0_9_2.html (Research Preview)
  • Compatible with existing v0.9.x Real Data packs
  • Includes new file: quality_v092.js

6. Conclusion

UNNS Laboratory v0.9.2 is the first version capable of evaluating not only molecular spectra, but its own τ-field predictions. With structural adequacy, dataset precision, curvature coherence, manifold reliability, τ-reliability, and statistical outlier forecasting, v0.9.2 introduces a full Quality Geometry Layer that prepares the UNNS Substrate for cross-molecule calibration and the approach to v1.0.