UNNS SUBSTRATE RESEARCH PROGRAM · STELLAR BOUNDARY DYNAMICS I · 2026-06-01

Stellar Boundary Dynamics

Three-layer structural study of a catastrophic stellar boundary transition — pre-supernova radial profiles, post-collapse light curves, and spectral line evolution — processed through STRUC-PERC-I v2.5.0 and alpha-application into bridge-comparable 5D structural vectors.
10 / 10 FULL_PERCOLATION 0 HARD · 0 GIANT · 0 TAIL 3 PHASES · A / B / C 3 BRIDGES · AB / BC / ABC 8 OBJECTS TOTAL 10 STRUC-PERC RUNS AB: WEAK SEPARATION · d = 0.401 BC: STRONG SEPARATION · d = 1.287 AC: STRONG SEPARATION · d = 1.365 ABC: A→B CONTACT · C BRANCHING SN2012aw PERSISTENT ANOMALY · BI = 1.470 SOURCES: Zenodo 5556959 · OSC / AstroCats · WISeREP
Instrument: STRUC-PERC-I v2.5.0 Phase A: Zenodo 5556959 · 12 M☉ + 20 M☉ pre-SN profiles Phase B: 6 core-collapse SNe · SN1987A–SN2013ej Phase C: SN1993J (685 rows) · SN2012aw (198 rows) Status: A / B / C / AB / BC / ABC complete · ready for manuscript synthesis
§1 CORPUS OVERVIEW — 10 RUNS · ZERO VIOLATIONS
10
TOTAL STRUC-PERC RUNS
10
FULL PERCOLATION
0
HARD / GIANT / TAIL
3
OBSERVATIONAL LAYERS
3
2 PAIRWISE + 1 TRI-DOMAIN
0.959
MAX TAIL DOMINANCE (C2)
3992
MAX κ_CONNECT (C2)
0.401
ABC A–B CENTROID
1.287
ABC B–C CENTROID
1.365
ABC A–C CENTROID
FINDING §1.1
10 / 10 FULL_PERCOLATION — zero admissibility violations across the most extreme astrophysical boundary event in the UNNS corpus

Every object across all three physical layers — pre-collapse stellar interior (A), post-collapse brightness response (B), and post-collapse spectral evolution (C) — returned FULL_PERCOLATION with giantRatio = 1.000 and isolated = 0. This constitutes the first UNNS corpus entry for catastrophic stellar boundary events. The complete absence of HARD, GIANT, or TAIL outcomes under core-collapse supernova conditions is consistent with the Margin-Confinement Law prediction that identity-preserving physical evolution cannot persistently cross ∂ℳ_adm, even under extreme forcing, and provides pilot-corpus support for that prediction in the astrophysical regime.

§2 PHASE A — PRE-SUPERNOVA RADIAL PROFILES (Zenodo 5556959)
STRUC-PERC-I RESULTS · v2.5.0 · 2 RUNS
ObjectMassVerdictκ_connTDnGR
A1_12M 12.09 M☉ FULL 2 0.000 64 1.000
A2_20M 19.98 M☉ FULL 1 0.000 64 1.000
Source: profile_single_M12.09_128net.data · profile_single_M19.98_128net.data · pre-SN radial snapshots, not time-resolved history tracks
ALPHA NORMALIZATION REVIEW · CHANNEL DOMINANCE

Both Phase A objects are composition-channel dominated. The composition/gap ratio far exceeds all other channels, requiring v2 normalization for bridge work. Scale-review ≠ failure — it diagnoses the dominant structural variable in the pre-SN profile.

ObjectThermal/gapDensity/gapCompos./gapSupport/gapLoss/gap
A1_12M1.071.0115.491.102.04
A2_20M1.051.05254.521.171.47
A2_20M composition/gap = 254.5× gap scale — the more massive progenitor's envelope composition profile dominates structural space. v2 bounded anisotropic persistence used for all bridge comparisons.
FINDING §2.1
Pre-collapse radial profiles are near-immediate connectors: κ = 1–2, TD = 0 — the most structurally homogeneous layer in this corpus

Both pre-supernova radial profiles connect at κ_connect ≤ 2, placing them in the same tier as biological fitness landscapes (κ = 0.42–2.00) and atmospheric wind fields in the 14-domain STRUC-PERC baseline. Zero tail dominance indicates no extreme outlier gaps in the radial structure. The terminal stellar interior, despite its extreme physical conditions (ρ_c ≈ 10¹⁰ g cm⁻³, T_c ≈ 10¹⁰ K), forms a locally homogeneous structural ladder — consistent with the USL prediction that admissible systems occupy the interior of ℳ_adm regardless of physical forcing scale.

§3 PHASE B — SUPERNOVA LIGHT CURVES (OSC / AstroCats)
STRUC-PERC-I RESULTS · 6 CORE-COLLAPSE SNe · ALL FULL_PERCOLATION
ObjectTypeVerdictκ_connectTail Dom.nBandsPhasesAdm. Persist.Note
SN 1987AII PecFULL0.42170.00034570.881anchor · reference
SN 1993JIIbFULL0.42170.00037770.677contact case
SN 1999emII-PFULL0.17780.00036760.870lowest κ
SN 2011dhIIbFULL1.00000.000451170.846
SN 2012awII-PFULL4.40000.329802170.778⚑ special case
SN 2013ejIIFULL0.31620.000952370.749most bands
κ_CONNECT DISTRIBUTION — PHASE B
SN 1999em
0.178
SN 1987A
0.422
SN 1993J
0.422
SN 2013ej
0.316
SN 2011dh
1.000
SN 2012aw ⚑
4.400
SN2012aw κ = 4.4 · 10× next highest (SN2011dh=1.0) · 25× lowest (SN1999em=0.178)
TAIL DOMINANCE DISTRIBUTION — PHASE B
SN 1987A
0.000
SN 1993J
0.000
SN 1999em
0.000
SN 2011dh
0.000
SN 2013ej
0.000
SN 2012aw ⚑
0.329
5/6 objects: TD = 0 · SN2012aw is the sole tail-dominated object in Phase B
FINDING §3.1
All six post-collapse light-curve ladders: FULL_PERCOLATION — the explosion boundary does not fragment the brightness-response trajectory

Post-collapse brightness trajectories, after compression into phase-gap ladders, form connected vulnerability-graph structures under STRUC-PERC-I. This extends the SN Ia finding from Beyond Fragmentation (where Δ-layer recovery from HARD was demonstrated) to Type II core-collapse events: even without explicit Δ-lifting, the phase-compressed multi-band light curves achieve FULL connectivity. The result supports treating supernova light curves as boundary-response relaxation trajectories within the UNNS / STRUC-PERC workflow.

§4 PHASE C — SPECTRAL TIME SERIES (WISeREP)
STRUC-PERC-I RESULTS · 2 PILOT OBJECTS · SPECTRAL LINE-WINDOW LADDERS
ObjectVerdictκ_connectTail Dom.nSpectraLinesDate rangeAdm. Persist.
C1 SN 1993J FULL 201.4 0.570 685998 1993-03-30 → 1993-11-08 0.684
C2 SN 2012aw ⚑ FULL 3992.4 0.959 198848 2011-03-21 → 2017-04-22 0.668
Lines: Hα · Hβ · He I 5876 · O I 7774 · Ca II NIR · Si II 6355 · Fe II 5169 · Ni/Co decay proxy · Scale review required for both objects
κ_CONNECT ESCALATION A → B → C
Log scale. Full corpus range shown per phase.
PHASE A
A2_20M
1
A1_12M
2
PHASE B
SN1999em
0.18
SN1987A/J
0.42
SN2012aw ⚑
4.4
PHASE C
SN1993J
201
SN2012aw ⚑
3992
κ jump A→C: ×2000 (SN1993J) · ×4000 (SN2012aw) · spectral layer far more connectivity-delayed than profile or light-curve layers
TAIL DOMINANCE ESCALATION A → B → C
Scale 0–1. Each bar = TD value.
PHASE A
A1 / A2
0.000
PHASE B (5 of 6)
5 objects
0.000
SN2012aw ⚑
0.329
PHASE C
SN1993J
0.570
SN2012aw ⚑
0.959
TD monotone rise A→B→C for SN2012aw: 0 → 0.329 → 0.959 · new corpus maximum · exceeds solar flare flux record (ρ̄ = 0.393 in STRUC-I corpus)
FINDING §4.1
C2_SN2012aw spectral ladder: TD = 0.959 and κ = 3992 — highest tail dominance in this corpus, approaching nuclear spectral regime

The SN2012aw spectral line-window ladder (n = 198, 84 spectra across 6 years) is FULL but extreme. Its tail dominance of 0.959 sets the record in this dataset and exceeds any STRUC-I physical domain result (solar flare max ρ̄ = 0.393). Its κ_connect of 3992 places it between the condensed matter upper range (~8100) and the nuclear spectral lower range (~3.8×10⁴), consistent with spectral features having larger gap heterogeneity than photometric features. The extremely high tail dominance is physically interpretable: the Ni/Co decay proxy and late-nebular iron emission lines produce extreme outlier gaps in a line-window sorted by wavelength, driving the tail fraction near unity while the backbone remains connected.

§5 A–B PAIRWISE BRIDGE DIAGNOSTIC — PRE-COLLAPSE ↔ LIGHT CURVE
CENTROID DISTANCE
0.584
WEAK SEPARATION
closest pair
A2_20MB_SN1993Jd = 0.233
close structural contact
most separated
A1_12MB_SN2012awd = 2.085
strongly separated
PHASE B RANKING BY NEAREST A PROFILE
RankB ObjectNearest ADistanceSeparation
1SN 1993JA2_20M0.233contact
2SN 2011dhA2_20M0.575weak
3SN 2013ejA2_20M0.627weak
4SN 1999emA1_12M0.835moderate
5SN 1987AA1_12M1.244moderate
6SN 2012aw ⚑A2_20M1.879strong
4/6 B objects nearest to A2_20M (20 M☉) · 2/6 nearest to A1_12M (12 M☉)
AB CENTROID FEATURE DELTAS · B − A SHIFT ACROSS THE BOUNDARY
FeatureA centroidB centroidΔ (B−A)Interpretation
mean_GR0.1220.418+0.296GR rises post-collapse — tighter backbone in light-curve space
var_GR0.0090.254+0.245increased GR variance — B objects more heterogeneous
anis. persist. (bounded)0.4930.798+0.305light curves more deformation-sensitive than profiles
admissibility persist.0.5780.532−0.046slight admissibility narrowing post-collapse (small)
kappa_connect_ref.0.3130.224−0.089B connects slightly earlier than A in normalized space
tail_dominance_ref.0.0000.167+0.167tail structure emerges post-boundary; driven by SN2012aw
FINDING §5.1
A–B bridge: weak separation (d = 0.584) — the boundary is a transition, not a structural rupture. A2_20M is the contact progenitor, gravitationally pulling 4/6 B objects.

The pre-collapse and post-collapse domains are not identical but they are not strongly separated. The 20 M☉ profile (A2_20M) acts as the structural attractor for the majority of post-collapse light curves: SN1993J (d = 0.233, contact), SN2011dh (d = 0.575), SN2013ej (d = 0.627), and SN2012aw (d = 1.879, still closest to A2 despite being the outlier). This is structurally interpretable: the 20 M☉ progenitor develops a larger, more extended envelope that maps onto the heterogeneous multi-band response trajectories of the Type IIb and Type II objects. The 12 M☉ profile attracts the IIP plateau-dominated objects (SN1999em, SN1987A), consistent with a more compact pre-SN structure.

§6 B–C PAIRWISE BRIDGE DIAGNOSTIC — LIGHT CURVE ↔ SPECTRAL EVOLUTION
CENTROID DISTANCE
1.318
STRONG SEPARATION
closest pair (cross-object!)
B_SN2012awC1_SN1993Jd = 0.648
weak separation · non-matched pair
most separated
B_SN1987AC2_SN2012awd = 2.646
strong separation
OBJECT-MATCHED ALIGNMENT TEST
SN1993J — COHERENT ✓
B_SN1993J ↔ C1_SN1993J: d = 0.712
matched pair is nearest C neighbor
cosine similarity = 0.712
light curve and spectra are structurally coherent
SN2012aw — INCOHERENT ✗
B_SN2012aw ↔ C2_SN2012aw: d = 1.923
matched pair is NOT nearest C neighbor
nearest C: C1_SN1993J at d = 0.648
spectral layer adds independent structural information
BC CENTROID FEATURE SHIFTS · C − B DELTA
FeatureB centroidC centroidΔ (C−B)Interpretation
tail_dominance_ref.0.0570.797+0.740largest shift — spectral layer is heavily tail-dominated
kappa_connect_ref.0.0000.525+0.525large κ jump — spectra require much larger connectivity scale
admissibility persist.0.6210.037−0.584C admissibility persistence is low — dominated by SN2012aw extreme values
anis. persist. (bounded)0.7070.802+0.095small further increase in deformation sensitivity
mean_GR0.0000.500+0.500GR centroid rises into C (normalized; both C objects at GR=1)
FINDING §6.1
B–C bridge: strong separation (d = 1.318) — the spectral layer is a structurally independent post-collapse observable, not a duplicate of the light-curve layer

The centroid separation doubles from A–B (0.584) to B–C (1.318). This is the primary cross-layer finding: the photometric and spectroscopic representations of the same ejecta are structurally distinct in 5D vector space, with the tail dominance shift (+0.740) being the dominant driver. SN1993J behaves coherently across B and C (its matched pair is its nearest C neighbor), validating the contact-case hypothesis from the A–B bridge. SN2012aw does not: its matched C counterpart is less structurally similar to it than C1_SN1993J is, indicating that SN2012aw's photometric and spectroscopic structures are themselves strongly separated — consistent with its persistent anomaly status.

§7 SN2012aw — PERSISTENT STRUCTURAL ANOMALY ACROSS ALL LAYERS
⚑ SN2012aw: PERSISTENT HIGH-TAIL / HIGH-κ CANDIDATE ACROSS A → B → C

SN2012aw (Type II-P, discovered 2012 March 16 in M95) consistently occupies the extreme structural position across every layer and bridge in this corpus. It is FULL in all three phases — admissibility is preserved — but its structural coordinates are outlier-level in B, extreme in C, and bridge-incoherent in the BC comparison.

PHASE A (proxy)
Not a C object in Phase A.
Nearest A profile: A2_20M
Distance from A1_12M: 2.085 (far)
Distance from A2_20M: 1.879 (closer but still strong separation)
Most separated B object from any A profile.
PHASE B
κ_connect: 4.400 (highest B)
Tail Dom.: 0.329 (only non-zero B)
n: 80 (2nd largest B)
Bands: 21 (largest B coverage)
Adm. persist.: 0.778
curvature/gap = 1847.9 (2nd largest B)
PHASE C
κ_connect: 3992.4 (×20 over C1)
Tail Dom.: 0.959 (corpus max)
n: 198 (84 spectra)
Date range: 6 yr (2011→2017)
High-tail attention: YES
High-κ attention: YES
C-layer flux dominates; depth/vel/width ≈ 0
FINDING §7.1
SN2012aw is admissibility-compliant but structurally extreme: monotone escalation TD(B→C) = 0.329 → 0.959 with BC layer incoherence — a robust FCC candidate

SN2012aw satisfies FULL_PERCOLATION in every phase, confirming the Margin-Confinement Law's prediction that even the most extreme astrophysical systems do not cross ∂ℳ_adm. However, its tail dominance escalation across layers (0 → 0.329 → 0.959), its light-curve coverage (21 photometric bands), its spectral persistence (6 years of spectra), and its BC-bridge incoherence (photometric and spectroscopic representations are themselves structurally distinct) collectively identify it as the strongest Forced Coherent Collapse (FCC) candidate in this corpus — a system that approaches the admissibility boundary under persistent extreme forcing while maintaining the giant component. Its status is consistent with the Beyond Fragmentation Unified Tail Dominance Scaling Law: systems undergoing sustained high-energy dissipation route to high-TD FULL states rather than fragmenting.

§8 CORPUS CONTEXT — 14-DOMAIN STRUC-PERC BASELINE
κ_CONNECT TIER PLACEMENT · STELLAR vs EXISTING CORPUS
Bars scaled to log range of corpus.
Biological (QT45)
0.42 – 2.00
Stellar A (this work)
1 – 2
Atmosphere (ERA5)
0.42 – 2.00
Stellar B (this work)
0.18 – 4.40
Condensed Matter
0.75 – 8,100
CMB (Planck 2018)
230 – 2,389
Stellar C (this work)
201 – 3,992
Nuclear (ENSDF)
38k – 420k
Atomic Spectra (QM-I)
210k – 420k
Stellar A and B occupy the near-immediate tier (biological/atmospheric range). Stellar C occupies the moderate-delay tier (CMB/condensed-matter range), approaching but not reaching nuclear spectral delays.
FINDING §8.1
Stellar adds a new cross-layer trajectory to the UNNS corpus: A (biological tier) → B (biological/condensed-matter tier) → C (CMB/condensed-matter tier) — all FULL, escalating structural complexity

Across the 14-domain STRUC-PERC baseline (81 runs, 0 hard violations), the stellar corpus adds 10 runs with the same zero-violation result, extending the program's empirical base to catastrophic stellar boundary events for the first time. The three-layer κ trajectory spans three distinct corpus tiers: Phase A lands in the biological/atmospheric regime (near-immediate connectivity), Phase B in the low condensed-matter regime, and Phase C approaches the CMB/condensed-matter regime. This cross-tier escalation within a single physical object family — where the observational representation, not the underlying physics, governs structural placement — directly corroborates the Phase Mapping finding that representation is the dominant structural variable.

§9 MANUSCRIPT FRAMEWORK CONNECTIONS
THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS vs CORPUS RESULTS
SourcePredictionStatus
Margin-Confinement Law No persistent HARD across any phase of a catastrophic IPF event. Any HARD → representation artifact. ✓ CONFIRMED
10/10 FULL
Beyond Fragmentation (FCC regime) SN light curves → high-TD FULL state under extreme forcing. Unified Tail Dominance Scaling across domains. ✓ CONFIRMED
SN2012aw TD=0.959
USL v5 — stratification Ordered systems occupy distinct pressure tiers in ℳ_adm. ρ encodes process complexity, not object identity. ✓ CONFIRMED
3 tiers A/B/C
Phase Mapping (α, μ) Representation is the dominant structural variable. Same physical object → different structural coordinates. ✓ CONFIRMED
A≠B≠C same event
Local Geometry / Boundaries Boundary approach navigable but not penetrable. Weakly separated domains at transition, strongly separated post-boundary observables. ✓ CONFIRMED
Pairwise: AB=0.584, BC=1.318
ABC v2: AB=0.401, BC=1.287, AC=1.365
Admissible Cluster Geometry Boundary events route through linked admissible regions, not a single trajectory. ✓ NEW EVIDENCE
A,B,C = distinct clusters
Structural Bridges Cross-domain structural contact through shared 5D vector geometry. ✓ NEW EVIDENCE
AB · BC · ABC complete
§10 ABC TRI-DOMAIN BRIDGE — GLOBAL ROUTING CLASSIFICATION
0.401
A–B CENTROID (weak sep.)
1.287
B–C CENTROID (strong sep.)
1.365
A–C CENTROID (strong sep.)
0.886
BC − AB BRANCHING
0.964
AC − AB SPECTRAL OFFSET
C BRANCH
GLOBAL ABC CLASS
FINDING §10.1 — PRIMARY ABC RESULT (v2 normalization-reviewed)
Global classification: A→B contact with C branching — the stellar boundary routes structure across non-equivalent admissible regimes, not through a single linear chain

Using the normalization-reviewed v2 structural vectors, the tri-domain bridge classifies the stellar boundary system as A_to_B_contact_with_C_branching. The pre-collapse radial-profile domain and post-collapse light-curve domain remain weakly separated (d = 0.401), while the spectral line-evolution domain is strongly separated from both B (d = 1.287) and A (d = 1.365). This supports a boundary-routing interpretation rather than a single linear A → B → C transition chain. The branching strength is BC − AB = 0.886 and AC − AB = 0.964: the spectral layer branches substantially further from both the pre-collapse and light-curve domains than those two domains are from each other. This establishes the stellar boundary as an admissible cluster-routing event: the system traverses the collapse, preserving admissibility throughout, but the observable post-collapse representations occupy structurally distinct regions of ℳ_adm. Internal percolation (FULL in all 10 runs) and cross-domain equivalence are confirmed to be different properties — a result directly consistent with the Admissible Cluster Geometry manuscript.

DOMAIN-PAIR DISTANCE MATRIX
PairCentroid dLabelClosest pairdFurthest paird
A – B 0.401 weak separation A2_20M ↔ B_SN1993J 0.150 A2_20M ↔ B_SN1987A 1.393
B – C 1.287 strong separation B_SN2012aw ↔ C1_SN1993J 0.543 B_SN1987A ↔ C2_SN2012aw 2.501
A – C 1.365 strong separation A2_20M ↔ C1_SN1993J 0.661 A1_12M ↔ C2_SN2012aw 2.449
ABC bridge: normalization-reviewed v2 vectors · v1/v2 issue resolved · all bridge runs now on comparable normalization basis
STRUCTURAL ROUTING GEOMETRY
Distance scale: 0 (identical) → 2.5 (maximally separated). Bars represent centroid distance.
DOMAIN CENTROID DISTANCES
A–B (weak sep.)
0.401
B–C (strong sep.)
1.287
A–C (strong sep.)
1.365
BRANCHING INDICES
BC − AB
+0.886
AC − AB
+0.964
Positive branching index confirms C is farther from A than B is — spectral layer does not lie on an A→B→C linear path
ABC CENTROID FEATURE SHIFTS — KEY STRUCTURAL COORDINATES ACROSS A / B / C
FeatureA centroidB centroidC centroidA→B ΔB→C ΔDominant driver
tail_dominance_ref. 0.000 0.057 0.797 +0.057 +0.740 largest B→C shift · spectral tail structure
kappa_connect_ref. 0.000 0.000 0.525 ≈0 +0.525 κ jump only at B→C transition
admissibility_persist. 0.593 0.549 0.033 −0.044 −0.516 C collapses admissibility persistence (SN2012aw extreme values)
collapse_onset_radius 0.000 0.250 0.000 +0.250 −0.250 A→B largest single shift · B and C share collapse onset = 0.05
mean_GR (norm.) ≈0 ≈0 0.500 ≈0 +0.500 GR centroid rise only visible in C (dominated by SN2012aw)
FINDING §10.2
The A→B transition is driven by collapse_onset_radius (+0.250); the B→C transition is driven by tail_dominance (+0.740) and κ (+0.525) — different structural dimensions govern each boundary crossing

The two structural transitions are driven by orthogonal feature dimensions. The A→B crossing (pre-collapse to light curve) is anchored primarily in collapse_onset_radius — the geometric onset coordinate that shifts when moving from radial profiles to temporal brightness trajectories. The B→C crossing (light curve to spectral evolution) is anchored in tail dominance and kappa_connect — the connectivity-depth and gap-outlier dimensions that characterize how heterogeneous the spectral line landscape is. This orthogonality means the boundary event is not a single structural deformation but a sequential activation of different structural variables, each governing one observable transition.

§10.3 OBJECT CHAIN ALIGNMENT — SN1993J CONTACT · SN2012aw ANOMALY
SN1993J — CONTACT CHAIN
A2_20M → B_SN1993J → C1_SN1993J
0.150
d(A→B)
0.654
d(B→C)
0.661
d(A→C)
Branching index: 0.504 (compact chain)
SN1993J is the coherent contact object across the full A–B–C chain. Its A→B step is the closest pair in the entire corpus (d = 0.150). Its B→C step is weak separation (d = 0.654). C is nearly equidistant from A and B (d_AC = 0.661 ≈ d_BC = 0.654) — the chain is compact and nearly equilateral. This object demonstrates that the stellar boundary can be traversed with near-linear structural inheritance.
✓ Compact transition chain · C still near B · coherence confirmed across all layers
SN2012aw — ANOMALY CHAIN ⚑
A2_20M → B_SN2012aw → C2_SN2012aw
0.438
d(A→B)
1.908
d(B→C)
2.009
d(A→C)
Branching index: 1.470 (2.9× SN1993J)
SN2012aw's chain is elongated and branching. Its A→B step (d = 0.438) is already weak separation — further from A than SN1993J's full A→C distance. Its B→C step explodes to d = 1.908, the largest matched-pair step in the corpus. Its spectral representation (C2) is structurally more distant from its pre-collapse progenitor than any other object. The branching index of 1.470 is 2.9× SN1993J's, confirming that SN2012aw is not merely a Phase B photometric anomaly but a cross-layer structural routing outlier whose spectral expression is maximally displaced from the boundary entry point.
⚑ C branches away from A–B path · persistent anomaly confirmed across full chain · BI = 1.470
FINDING §10.3
Branching index contrast: SN1993J BI = 0.504 (compact chain) vs SN2012aw BI = 1.470 (branching anomaly) — the corpus spans both structural routing archetypes

The two object chains represent opposite ends of the boundary routing spectrum. SN1993J achieves near-linear structural inheritance: its A→B distance (0.150) is the corpus minimum, and its full chain is compact with d_AC ≈ d_BC. This is the closest to a genuine A → B → C transition observable in the current dataset. SN2012aw achieves maximal branching: each successive transition amplifies structural displacement, with the B→C step (1.908) nearly 3× SN1993J's B→C step (0.654). Both objects remain FULL_PERCOLATION in all three layers, confirming that this is a difference in structural routing geometry, not in admissibility. The Admissible Cluster Geometry framework anticipates this pattern: internally connected regions can be widely separated in inter-domain bridge space while each maintaining local percolation — consistent with what is observed here.

ABC BRIDGE — ANSWERS TO PRIOR OPEN QUESTIONS
QuestionAnswer from ABC bridgeStatus
Does A→B→C form a monotone chain? No. A–B is contact; B–C and A–C are strong separation. The distances are not monotone — C is nearly equidistant from A and B (1.365 vs 1.287). ✓ RESOLVED
Does C branch away from B as an independent regime? Yes. BC − AB = +0.886 confirms strong C branching. The global classification is A_to_B_contact_with_C_branching. ✓ CONFIRMED
Does SN2012aw remain anomalous across all three layers jointly? Yes. Branching index 1.470 (2.9× SN1993J). Its spectral representation is the most displaced component of the entire corpus from its progenitor state. ✓ CONFIRMED
Does SN1993J maintain contact status across full ABC chain? Yes. BI = 0.504, compact equilateral chain, A→B distance = 0.150 (corpus minimum). Coherence confirmed across all three layers. ✓ CONFIRMED
Is the stellar boundary a cluster of admissible regions? Yes. A, B, C are internally FULL, mutually separated in bridge space, linked by geometry. This is consistent with the Admissible Cluster Geometry prediction and provides candidate pilot evidence for it. ✓ NEW EVIDENCE
§11 OPEN QUESTIONS AND CORPUS EXPANSION
MANUSCRIPT SYNTHESIS — READY

All pipeline stages complete. The recommended manuscript framing from the ABC result record:

Stellar Boundary Dynamics:
Catastrophic Transition as Routing Between
Admissible Structural Regimes
Required manuscript elements:
· ABC bridge method and centroid distances
· Global classification A_to_B_contact_with_C_branching
· SN1993J contact-chain result (BI = 0.504)
· SN2012aw anomaly-chain result (BI = 1.470)
· Orthogonal feature drivers at each transition
· General theoretical claim: catastrophic transition preserves
admissibility while routing across non-equivalent observable regimes
CORPUS EXPANSION DIRECTIONS

The pilot establishes the workflow. Priority expansions:

More progenitor mass points (15 M☉, 25 M☉, binary-stripped)
More Type II subtypes (IIn, IIL, stripped IIb vs IIP)
Time-resolved MESA history.data tracks (full A trajectory)
Binary-stripped progenitor profiles from Zenodo 5556959
Magnetar spin-down sequence (Margin-Confinement Law §10 target)
Stellar flare time series (solar flare corpus bridge)
✓ ABC bridge v2 rerun complete · global classification confirmed (A_to_B_contact_with_C_branching)
STELLAR BOUNDARY DYNAMICS I — UNNS Substrate Research Program · 2026-06-02
Instrument: STRUC-PERC-I v2.5.0 · Source A: Zenodo 5556959 (Laplace et al.) · Source B: Open Supernova Catalog / AstroCats · Source C: WISeREP
Phase A: 2 pre-SN radial profiles (12.09 M☉ + 19.98 M☉ single, 128-net) · Phase B: 6 core-collapse SNe (SN1987A, 1993J, 1999em, 2011dh, 2012aw, 2013ej) · Phase C: 2 spectral series (SN1993J 685 rows · SN2012aw 198 rows)
All STRUC-PERC-I runs: FULL_PERCOLATION · 0 HARD · 0 GIANT · 0 TAIL · giantRatio = 1.000 all objects · isolated = 0 all objects
ABC bridge (v2): A_to_B_contact_with_C_branching · d(AB) = 0.401 · d(BC) = 1.287 · d(AC) = 1.365 · SN1993J BI = 0.504 · SN2012aw BI = 1.470
Caution: Phase A = terminal radial snapshots, not time-resolved tracks · Phase C spectral line-window proxies = structural features, not abundance reconstructions · scale review required for 9/10 objects · v2 normalization-reviewed vectors used in AB, BC, and ABC; AB/BC are pairwise diagnostics, while ABC is the unified tri-domain routing geometry · SN2012aw high-tail/high-κ attention across B and C