First direct comparison of the two canonical UNNS instruments across shared physical domains — 14 domains, 5,233 + 81 evaluations, two orthogonal structural probes of the same universal admissibility law.
DIRECTION — Necessary only (Theorem 1 proven, Conj.1 open)
KEY RESULT — 1 Theorem-1 trigger (TiO₂ raw density)
02MASTER CROSS-DOMAIN ALIGNMENT TABLE
DOMAIN-BY-DOMAIN DUAL INSTRUMENT SUMMARY all shared domains · metrics from each corpus · alignment assessment
Domain
STRUC-I mean ρ · zone · Aκ
STRUC-PERC verdict · giant ratio · κ_conn
Alignment
mean ρ
Pressure zone
min Aκ
Tier
Giant ratio
κ_connect
Molecular (HITRAN)
0.103
RELAXED
1.0000
GIANT
0.9985
— (no conn)
◎Consistent
Atomic / Zeeman
0.9585
CRITICAL
0.9990
FULL
1.0000
2–4 × 10⁵
⇄Complementary
Atomic / Normal spectra
0.21–0.66
TENSION
1.0000
FULL / TAIL
0.994–1.000
2–4 × 10⁵
◎Consistent
Biological (QT45)
0.188–0.819
STABLE → BDY
≈1.000
FULL
1.0000
0.42 – 2.00
◎Consistent
Nuclear (ENSDF)
0.197
RELAXED
1.0000
FULL / TAIL
0.976–1.000
3.8×10⁴–4.2×10⁵
◎Consistent
Condensed Matter
0.178–0.263
STABLE – WEAK
0.9995
FULL / HARD
0.833–1.000
0.75 – 8072
△Partial (TiO₂)
CMB (Planck 2018)
—
not in STRUC-I
—
FULL
1.0000
230 – 2389
PERC-only
Cosmic Web
0.143 (0.651 peak)
STABLE–WEAK
≈1.000
GIANT / TAIL
0.994–0.999
— (no conn)
◎Consistent
Atmosphere (ERA5)
0.086–0.225
RELAXED–STABLE
≈1.000
FULL
1.0000
0.42 – 2.00
◎Consistent
Geodesy / GPS
—
not in STRUC-I
—
FULL / GIANT
0.999
253 – 402
PERC-only
Gravity / Geoid
0.073 (Earth) → 0.640 (Moon)
STABLE – NEAR BDY
0.802 (Moon absS)
GIANT
0.997–1.000
— (no conn)
◎Consistent
Solar Plasma
0.022–0.393
STABLE–WEAK
≈1.000
TAIL
0.982
— (TAIL)
◎Consistent
Random Matrix (GOE)
0.087–0.101
RELAXED
1.0000
GIANT
0.9960
— (GIANT)
◎Consistent
◎ Consistent — instruments agree on structural status.
△ Partial — divergence on one sub-case (TiO₂).
⇄ Complementary — instruments reveal orthogonal aspects of the same structure.
03CROSS-INSTRUMENT FINDINGS
CROSS-FINDING 01
Zeeman Atomic Ladders — Maximum Pressure in STRUC-I, Maximum Delay in STRUC-PERC: Orthogonal Probes of the Same Boundary
The Zeeman domain is the single most striking cross-instrument result. STRUC-I reports ρ = 0.9585 — the highest structural pressure in the entire physical corpus, deep in the CRITICAL zone, 10× higher than nuclear, with only 4.15% margin before violation. STRUC-PERC reports FULL_PERCOLATION — but at κ_connect = 2–4 × 10⁵, the most extreme connectivity delay of any domain. Both instruments are correct; they are measuring orthogonal structural properties of the same gap architecture. STRUC-I sees: the inversion budget is almost fully exhausted (ν ≈ inv). STRUC-PERC sees: the gap distribution has extreme outlier transitions that require astronomical κ to bridge. The physical mechanism is the same — fine-structure Zeeman splittings produce a small bulk of nearly-equal gaps (high ρ, high mutual connectivity) pierced by a handful of extreme hyperfine transitions (astronomical tail, delayed percolation). The system is simultaneously maximally pressured and fully percolating — the boundary-stabilized state captured from two angles.
STRUC-I: ρ = 0.9585 ± 0.00004 · Aκ = 0.9990 · CRITICAL zone · 4.15% margin
STRUC-PERC: FULL_PERCOLATION · κ_conn = 206k–420k (Li, Na, He-II, Zeeman variants)
JOINT READING: Boundary-stabilized structure — maximum pressure with full long-range connectivity at extreme scale
CROSS-FINDING 02
Biological Domain — Admissible Under Both Probes, But With a Critical Distinction: Deletion Mutations Are Boundary-Stabilized in STRUC-I While STRUC-PERC Sees Them as FULL
Both instruments agree the QT45 ribozyme fitness landscape is admissible. But the granularity of the comparison is revealing. STRUC-PERC sees a flat picture: all 7 biological ladders return FULL_PERCOLATION with very low κ_conn (0.42–2.00) — the most immediately connective physical domain in the corpus. STRUC-I reveals a wide internal spread: substitution ladders ρ ≈ 0.188 (Stable), combined_del ρ = 0.554 (Weak Persistence), deletion ρ = 0.819 (Boundary-Stabilized — the highest-pressure biological result and among the highest in the entire corpus). Both are admissible, but STRUC-I shows that deletion mutations push the fitness landscape to the very edge of the admissibility boundary in the inversion space, while STRUC-PERC finds that the gap structure still percolates easily. The biological system operates near the USL limit not through structural fragmentation but through extreme inversion pressure.
STRUC-I deletion_global: ρ = 0.819 · Boundary-Stabilized · Aκ = 1.000
STRUC-PERC deletion_global: FULL_PERCOLATION · κ_conn = 0.750
JOINT READING: Maximum admissible structural stress — high pressure boundary reached but not crossed, with fast global connectivity
CROSS-FINDING 03
Cosmic Web — Both Instruments Detect the Void-Filament Transition, But at Different Scales and via Different Mechanisms
The cosmic web domain produces the strongest qualitative agreement across instruments. STRUC-I observes a dramatic ν-explosion at κ ≈ 0.30: ν jumps 8.7× in a single κ step, ρ collapses from 0.651 to 0.058, and the ρ(κ) profile has the most dramatic cliff in the entire corpus. STRUC-PERC finds that DESI ladders cannot achieve κ_connect at any tested scale — giant ratio plateaus at 0.994, void gaps of ~10⁶ × median dominate the tail, tail dominance = 0.913. Both instruments are detecting the same physical structure: the separation between galaxy filament spacings and void diameters. STRUC-I sees it as a scale transition in the admissibility budget (the cliff). STRUC-PERC sees it as persistent non-connectivity (the isolated void vertices). The joint result establishes this as the most structurally complex domain in the shared corpus — simultaneously highly admissible (Aκ ≈ 1.000) and never fully connected.
STRUC-I DESI xyz: ρ_peak = 0.651 · ν jump 17→148 at κ=0.307 · Aκ ≈ 1.000 throughout
STRUC-PERC DESI: TAIL_FRAGMENTATION · GR = 0.994 · tail_dominance = 0.913 · no κ_connect
JOINT READING: Void-filament transition scale is structurally non-connectable but admissible — the law holds despite extreme scale separation
CROSS-FINDING 04
Condensed Matter — The Only Domain Where Instruments Partially Diverge: TiO₂ Raw Density Triggers STRUC-PERC Theorem 1 While STRUC-I Finds It Admissible in Phase-Chain Form
The condensed matter domain is the only case of genuine (partial) instrumental divergence. STRUC-I tests TiO₂ as a crystallographic phase chain (rutile/anatase/brookite polymorphs, n=3, ρ = 0.033) — a Stable Structure result with zero pressure. STRUC-PERC tests TiO₂ as a raw density-of-states ladder (HARD_FRAGMENTATION, giant ratio 0.833, Theorem 1 triggered) and as a cleaned spectral peaks ladder (FULL_PERCOLATION at κ_conn = 681). The divergence is not a contradiction — it is a representation sensitivity finding. The instruments are measuring different physical objects derived from the same material. The phase-chain representation (structural parameters across polymorphs) is admissibility-trivial (n=3, all gaps similar). The raw DOS representation reveals genuine structural fragmentation invisible to STRUC-I's phase-chain probe. This is the most important data-representation finding in the corpus.
STRUC-I TiO₂ phase-chain: ρ = 0.033 · n=3 · Stable Structure · Aκ = 1.0000
STRUC-PERC tio2_density: HARD_FRAGMENTATION · GR = 0.833 · Theorem 1 triggered
STRUC-PERC tio2_cleaned: FULL_PERCOLATION · κ_conn = 681
JOINT READING: Same material, three representations → three different structural assessments
CROSS-FINDING 05
Nuclear Domain — STRUC-I Sees Low Uniform Pressure; STRUC-PERC Identifies a Structurally Anomalous Subgroup (²³⁸U, ¹⁵⁰Nd, ¹⁰⁰Mo, ⁴⁸Ca)
STRUC-I reports nuclear as a compact, well-behaved domain: mean ρ = 0.197 (2.2× GOE null), all ladders Stable Structure, no Weak Persistence or boundary cases. The instrument sees the nuclear domain as homogeneous. STRUC-PERC disagrees on homogeneity: 10 isotopes return FULL_PERCOLATION (consistent with STRUC-I's Stable verdict) but 4 return TAIL_FRAGMENTATION with tail dominance = 1.000 and astronomical max ratios (10⁹–10¹⁸). The TAIL isotopes — ²³⁸U, ¹⁵⁰Nd, ¹⁰⁰Mo, ⁴⁸Ca — are all nuclei with known structural complexity (deformation, shape coexistence, double β-decay candidacy). STRUC-I's ρ metric averages over all gap pairs and does not flag these isotopes because their extreme tail transitions are rare (small count, small ρ contribution). STRUC-PERC's tail dominance = 1.000 means these single transitions consume 100% of the gap budget — a structural asymmetry STRUC-I cannot resolve. STRUC-PERC provides strictly finer nuclear discrimination.
STRUC-I nuclear: mean ρ = 0.197 · all 15 ladders Stable · no distinction among isotopes
STRUC-PERC: 10 FULL (κ_conn 37k–418k) · 4 TAIL (²³⁸U/¹⁵⁰Nd/¹⁰⁰Mo/⁴⁸Ca · GR 0.976–0.988 · td=1.000)
Note: ⁴⁸Ca previously flagged as cross-constant reversal anomaly in α-sweep corpus — consistent
CROSS-FINDING 06
Random Matrix GOE — Both Instruments Place It at the Structural Floor, But With Different Resolution: STRUC-I Shows Tight ρ = 0.09, STRUC-PERC Shows Persistent GIANT (Not FULL)
STRUC-I shows GOE as the null baseline: ρ = 0.087–0.101 across n=100, 200, 500, the most relaxed structural state of any tested object, below even Earth's gravity field. This is the expected RMT result — level repulsion produces locally uniform spacing (small ρ, minimal inversion pressure). STRUC-PERC finds GIANT_COMPONENT_PERCOLATION rather than FULL, with GR = 0.9960, no κ_connect on the main grid or via extension. This is a new observation: GOE level repulsion creates a nearly-but-not-quite globally connected graph. The isolated vertices correspond to rare large eigenvalue gaps (the tail of the GOE bulk spacing distribution). Both instruments agree the GOE is structurally benign; STRUC-PERC adds that even the most relaxed known ordered structure cannot achieve perfect percolation within the tested κ range.
STRUC-I GOE: ρ = 0.087–0.101 · Stable Structure · Aκ = 1.0000 · 3,000 samples
STRUC-PERC GOE: GIANT · GR = 0.9960 · no κ_connect · tail_dominance = ?
JOINT READING: GOE is structurally minimal — lowest ρ and near-complete percolation, both consistent with maximal level repulsion
CROSS-FINDING 07
Solar Plasma — STRUC-I Reveals Three Internal Structural Tiers (F10.7, Dynamo, Flare); STRUC-PERC Confirms the Flare as Structurally Stressed
The solar domain is where both instruments agree most concisely on internal differentiation. STRUC-I shows F10.7 coronal flux at ρ = 0.022 (most relaxed solar measurement, below GOE), solar dynamo at ρ = 0.376 (Weak Persistence, distributed Aκ deficits), and flare flux at ρ_peak = 0.806 (Weak Persistence, sharpest ν-cliff in the corpus, 46× jump at κ ≈ 0.052). STRUC-PERC tests the GOES-XRS 2014 solar flare record (flux-type ladder) and finds TAIL_FRAGMENTATION with GR = 0.982, tail dominance = 1.000, max ratio = 3.2×10¹⁰. The 10¹⁰ × median outlier in STRUC-PERC is the physical flare spike — the same structural feature that creates STRUC-I's 46× ν cliff. The instruments independently identify the same solar flare energy as the dominant structural anomaly.
STRUC-I flare flux: ρ_peak = 0.806 · ν jumps 1→46 at κ=0.052 · Weak Persistence
STRUC-PERC GOES-XRS: TAIL · GR=0.982 · tail_dominance=1.000 · max_ratio=3.2×10¹⁰
JOINT READING: Solar flare energy is the same structural event seen as a ν-cliff (STRUC-I) and a tail-dominated isolated gap (STRUC-PERC)
CROSS-FINDING 08
Gravity / Geoid — STRUC-I Finds Earth as Most Ordered Physical Body; STRUC-PERC Finds All Planetary Bodies as GIANT (No κ_connect)
STRUC-I distinguishes planetary bodies dramatically: Earth ρ = 0.073 (below GOE, most ordered), Mars ρ = 0.277, Moon absS ρ = 0.640 (near-random — "statistically indistinguishable from a synthetic random field" for S-coefficient ordering). STRUC-PERC collapses this hierarchy: all four gravity field ladders (Earth EIGEN-6C4, Mars JGM85, Moon AIUB-GRL350A, Earth spatial 2°) return GIANT with GR = 0.997–1.000, no κ_connect. The STRUC-PERC result is informationally poorer here — it cannot distinguish Earth's extraordinary geometric regularity from the Moon's near-random coefficient ordering. STRUC-I provides strictly richer discrimination in this domain. This is the most significant case where STRUC-I outperforms STRUC-PERC.
STRUCTURAL PRESSURE (ρ) × CONNECTIVITY SCALE (κ_connect) each domain plotted on dual axes · log-scale κ_connect
ρ (STRUC-I pressure)
κ_connect (log scale) →
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Dashed circles = GIANT/TAIL with no κ_connect · plotted at κ ≈ 0.05 (notional)
05DOMAIN-BY-DOMAIN DETAILED COMPARISON
MOLECULAR — HITRAN (H₂O, NH₃, CO₂, CH₄, O₃, CO)
6 ladders · n ≈ 1,634–2,000 (STRUC-I) · n ≈ 170k downsampled (STRUC-PERC)
STRUC-Iρ = 0.103 · Stable Structure · Aκ = 1.000
Low structural pressure — 1.2× GOE null. No ladder reaches Tension zone. Molecular vibrational-rotational level ladders have near-uniform gap distributions at the probed scale. Zero inversion pressure anomalies across all κ.
STRUC-PERCGIANT · GR ≈ 0.9985 · no κ_connect
Near-complete but not full percolation. No adaptive extension κ_connect found. Isolated vertices = a handful of extreme high-energy vibrational transitions outside the IQR-scaled window. Both probes are consistent: low structural stress, high connectivity, isolated outlier gaps not severe enough to trigger Theorem 1.
Joint verdict: Structurally relaxed, admissible, near-fully connected. STRUC-PERC adds: one or few isolated high-energy gaps persist that STRUC-I's ρ does not single out.
ATOMIC — ZEEMAN (H, He, Na, Ca, Ag, Au in magnetic field)
Highest ρ in entire physical corpus. Universal across 8 elements (std = 0.000036). 95.85% of ν budget consumed. All ladders in CRITICAL zone. Yet Aκ = 0.9990 — the law holds. This is the boundary-stabilized state: operating at maximum structural pressure without violation.
STRUC-PERCFULL · GR = 1.000 · κ_conn = 2–4 × 10⁵
Full percolation — but at extreme scale. Connectivity achieved only at κ two to four orders of magnitude above the main grid. Tail dominance reflects hyperfine transition outliers. Full percolation at κ ≈ 3×10⁵ means the bulk Zeeman structure is homogeneous enough to connect at large scale; the fine-structure transitions are the outliers STRUC-I sees as high ρ.
Complementary insight: STRUC-I captures extreme inversion pressure; STRUC-PERC captures extreme connectivity delay. Both arise from the same Zeeman splitting gap structure. Together they describe the boundary-stabilized state completely.
Widest within-domain ρ spread in the biological corpus. Substitution ladders: ρ ≈ 0.188 (Stable). combined_del: ρ = 0.554 (Weak Persistence). deletion: ρ = 0.819 (Boundary-Stabilized — highest biological ρ, among highest in corpus). All Aκ = 1.000. Living matter reaches the USL boundary at maximum pressure via deletion mutations.
STRUC-PERCFULL all · κ_conn = 0.42 – 2.00
All 7 ladders FULL_PERCOLATION. Lowest κ_connect of any physical domain (0.42–2.00). Fitness landscape gap structures are the most immediately homogeneous in the corpus. STRUC-PERC sees no distinction among mutant classes — all connect at κ ≤ 2. The deletion mutation's extreme inversion pressure (STRUC-I) does not manifest as percolation delay.
Key finding: Biological systems reach the USL pressure boundary through inversion saturation (STRUC-I), not through connectivity fragmentation (STRUC-PERC). The law is under maximum stress in living matter from the inversion direction, not the percolation direction.
Compact domain — all 15 ladders in Stable Structure zone. No isotope reaches Tension or Weak Persistence. The mean ρ = 0.197 is 2.2× GOE null, consistent with the known UNNS nuclear finding. No internal discrimination among isotopes.
STRUC-PERC10 FULL · 4 TAIL (²³⁸U/¹⁵⁰Nd/¹⁰⁰Mo/⁴⁸Ca)
4 isotopes with structural anomalies show TAIL_FRAGMENTATION (tail dominance = 1.000, max ratio 10⁹–10¹⁸). 10 percolate at κ_conn = 37k–418k. ⁴⁸Ca again flagged — consistent with its cross-constant reversal in the α-sweep corpus. STRUC-PERC provides strictly finer nuclear discrimination than STRUC-I.
STRUC-PERC advantage: Identifies structurally anomalous isotopes invisible to STRUC-I's aggregate ρ metric. The extreme outlier γ-transitions consume 100% of the gap budget (tail dominance = 1.000) but contribute minimally to ρ due to their rarity.
STRUC-Iρ = 0.178–0.263 · Stable–Weak · min Aκ = 0.9995
Density ladders show Weak Persistence (ρ = 0.204–0.263, min Aκ = 0.9995) for small-n (n ≤ 42). Formation energy ladders are Stable (ρ = 0.226). Transition-metal oxides: variable ρ = 0.033–0.424 (TiO₂ DFT phase-chain ρ = 0.033; Si_density ρ = 0.424). No clean violations.
STRUC-PERC11 FULL · 1 HARD (TiO₂ raw DOS)
TiO₂ raw density-of-states ladder: HARD_FRAGMENTATION (GR = 0.833) — only Theorem 1 trigger in corpus. TiO₂ cleaned dataset: FULL at κ_conn = 681. Si density: FULL at κ_conn = 2 (despite STRUC-I ρ = 0.424, one of highest condensed-matter results). Wide κ_conn spread: 0.75 (SnO) to 8072 (VO cleaned).
Representation sensitivity: TiO₂ raw DOS triggers Theorem 1 (STRUC-PERC); TiO₂ phase-chain is Stable (STRUC-I). Same material, different data representations, opposite extremes. This is the only domain where the instruments partially diverge — and it is a data-representation finding, not a physical contradiction.
06INSTRUMENT COMPLEMENTARITY ASSESSMENT
WHERE EACH INSTRUMENT EXCELS domain-level resolution · structural depth · discrimination power
STRUC-I ADVANTAGES
✓ Planetary gravity discrimination — resolves Earth vs. Mars vs. Moon (STRUC-PERC cannot)
✓ Nuclear isotope discrimination — identifies ²³⁸U/¹⁵⁰Nd/¹⁰⁰Mo/⁴⁸Ca as anomalous (STRUC-I sees them as uniform)
✓ Data-representation sensitivity — TiO₂ raw vs. cleaned reveals DOS-ladder fragmentation invisible to STRUC-I
✓ κ_connect as structural clock — orders domains on a single continuous scale (0.01 to 420k)
✓ Theorem 1 triggering — necessary direction proof fires on TiO₂; STRUC-I finds it admissible
✓ Tail dominance metric — isolates the budget impact of outlier gaps (missing from STRUC-I)
✓ CMB and geodesy — new domains not tested in STRUC-I
✓ Topology — graph-level view of structural connectivity; STRUC-I is inversion-counting only
07JOINT THEORETICAL CONCLUSIONS
JOINT CONCLUSION 01
The USL admissibility law holds across both instrument lenses with zero contradictions in the shared corpus
Across all shared domains, no run produces a physical contradiction between the two instruments. Where STRUC-I finds Stable Structure, STRUC-PERC finds FULL or GIANT percolation. Where STRUC-I finds Weak Persistence or Boundary-Stabilized, STRUC-PERC finds FULL percolation at large κ or TAIL (inconclusive). The single HARD_FRAGMENTATION case (TiO₂ raw DOS) tests a representation not covered by STRUC-I's phase-chain probe — not a contradiction but a representation-sensitivity finding. The two instruments are consistent with each other everywhere they overlap.
JOINT CONCLUSION 02
The boundary-stabilized state is confirmed by both instruments simultaneously, with Zeeman as the clearest example
The Zeeman domain demonstrates the boundary-stabilized state from two independent angles simultaneously. STRUC-I: ρ = 0.9585 (CRITICAL, 4.15% margin). STRUC-PERC: FULL at κ = 2–4×10⁵ (extreme delay). A system can simultaneously be at maximum structural pressure (STRUC-I) and fully percolating at large scale (STRUC-PERC). This is not a paradox — it reflects two orthogonal structural properties of the same gap architecture. The physical system is sitting at the edge of the admissibility boundary from the inversion direction while being globally connected in the percolation graph. Both measurements are required to fully characterise the boundary-stabilized state.
JOINT CONCLUSION 03
The two instruments together establish a complete structural taxonomy: five joint states replace the two-state binary of either instrument alone
Individually, STRUC-I classifies by pressure zone (4 levels) and STRUC-PERC by percolation tier (4 levels). Together, the joint matrix identifies five empirically distinct structural states in this corpus: (1) Relaxed-Connected (low ρ, FULL/GIANT, low κ) — biological, atmosphere; (2) Moderate-Connected (medium ρ, FULL, moderate κ) — nuclear, condensed matter; (3) Relaxed-Tail (low ρ, GIANT, no conn) — molecular, geoid, GOE; (4) Stressed-Extreme (high ρ, FULL at extreme κ) — Zeeman; (5) Stressed-Fragmented (high ρ, TAIL, no conn) — cosmic web peak, solar flare. No physical system falls in the (high ρ, HARD) cell — the only HARD case is TiO₂ raw DOS, a data representation issue not arising from the physical system itself.
UNNS SUBSTRATE RESEARCH PROGRAM · CROSS-INSTRUMENT ANALYSIS · 2026-04-06STRUC-I v1.0.4 (5,233 runs) × STRUC-PERC-I v2.4.0 (81 runs) · 10 shared domainsUSL: ZERO PHYSICAL CONTRADICTIONS · Theorem 1: 1/81 (representation) · Conjecture 1: OPEN