This chamber tests whether exclusion wedges and volumetric interaction geometry
emerge when feasibility predicates are explicitly relaxed, bounded, and exposed—without altering underlying mechanisms.
Research Question: Is the absence of triple-axis geometry in Phase P₁ structural,
or an artifact of conservative predicate support?
Phase P₂ Authorization: Predicate patching, measurement densification, and controlled
parameter expansion are explicitly permitted and logged. This is refinement, not retroactive correction.
⚙️ Relaxation Schedule Control
Schedule A
Conservative Linear
β: ±0.005, λ: ±5%
Schedule B
Moderate Expansion
β: ±0.010, λ: ±10%
Schedule C
Aggressive Probing
β: ±0.020, λ: ±15%
Δβ = 0.005
Symmetric expansion around β=0.05
Δλ = ±5%
Percentage expansion around λ₀
Δα = 0.05
Boundary softening around α=1.0
Points per axis (total: 1728)
Fixed block: 196884–196933 (Phase P₁ continuity)
τ = 0.80
Success requires ≥40/50 seeds
📊 Execution Status
Current Schedule:A (Conservative)
Grid Points Computed:0 / 1728
Defined Fraction:—
Progress:Ready
🔬 Primary Observables
Defined Volume Fraction
—
Target: ≥80% (F1 criterion)
Max Triple Residual
—
|Δ₃₄₅|ₘₐₓ (threshold: 0.20)
Non-Additive Volume
—
Fraction with |Δ| ≥ 0.10
Exclusion Wedge Volume
—
Target: ≥5% contiguous
✅ Success Criteria Validation
Criterion
Target
Observed
Status
S₁: Exclusion Geometry Emergence
≥5% contiguous volume
—
—
S₂: Stable Geometry Under Relaxation
Persist across ≥2 schedules
—
—
S₃: Geometry Dominance
Super-linear growth
—
—
📈 Interaction Geometry Visualization
3D projection: V-3 (β) × V-4 (λ) × V-5 (α) parameter space