Charge Boundary Routing I
Phase 1 Chamber Comparison Report
phase1_chamber_comparison_report.txt

Generated: 2026-06-15

Purpose
-------
This report combines the Phase 1 STRUC-PERC-I v2.5.0 batch result
with the STRUC-I v1.0.4 result for the same six ABCD charge-boundary
ladder encodings.

The comparison asks whether the charge corpus is structurally captured
by bare electric charge value or by UNNS route/closure representation.

Instruments
-----------
STRUC-PERC-I v2.5.0
    Role: connectivity / percolation / fragmentation screen.
    Output vocabulary here: FULL_PERCOLATION or HARD_FRAGMENTATION.

STRUC-I v1.0.4
    Role: admissibility-pressure / perturbation-boundary screen.
    Inequality: inv(P_epsilon; L) <= nu(V_epsilon(L)).
    Output for all six encodings: Structural Boundary / Transitional Structure.

Input Encodings
---------------
- ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_signed_charge.csv
- ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_absolute_charge.csv
- ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_boundary_route_coordinate.csv
- ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_closure_class_code.csv
- ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_closure_state_code.csv
- ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_route_class_code.csv

Executive Result
----------------
The combined chamber result is coherent:

    STRUC-PERC-I separates charge-value projections from route/closure lifts.
    STRUC-I places all six encodings on the Structural Boundary as Transitional Structure.

Therefore the Phase 1 corpus is not simply random, fully stable, or empty.
It behaves as a boundary object whose connectivity depends on representation.

Compact result statement:

    Charge-value space fragments; charge-route space percolates;
    the whole corpus remains a transitional structural boundary under perturbation.

Combined Result Table
---------------------

| Encoding | STRUC-PERC-I verdict | Giant ratio | kappa_connect | STRUC-I regime | STRUC-I state | mean Aκ | min Aκ | mean rho | Interpretation |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
| signed_charge | HARD_FRAGMENTATION | 0.857142857143 | null | Structural Boundary | Transitional Structure | 0.657413 | 0.5845 | 0.976987 | Raw signed charge is the most fragile representation. STRUC-PERC-I reports hard fragmentation, while STRUC-I places it at the structural boundary with the lowest mean Aκ among the six encodings. |
| absolute_charge | HARD_FRAGMENTATION | 0.75 | null | Structural Boundary | Transitional Structure | 0.865737 | 0.843 | 0.91297 | Magnitude-only charge also fragments. Removing sign does not recover percolation, but STRUC-I still treats it as a transitional boundary structure. |
| boundary_route_coordinate | FULL_PERCOLATION | 1 | 1 | Structural Boundary | Transitional Structure | 0.8804 | 0.8475 | 0.899682 | Detailed UNNS boundary-route coordinate fully percolates. STRUC-I still classifies it as a structural boundary, which indicates connected but transitional route geometry rather than trivial stability. |
| closure_class_code | FULL_PERCOLATION | 1 | 1 | Structural Boundary | Transitional Structure | 0.881375 | 0.849 | 0.899789 | Closure taxonomy fully percolates and remains transitional under STRUC-I. This supports the interpretation that the corpus coheres at the closure-class level. |
| closure_state_code | FULL_PERCOLATION | 1 | 0.01 | Structural Boundary | Transitional Structure | 0.873775 | 0.8485 | 0.915765 | Closed/internal/not-closed/constrained/unresolved state ordering fully percolates, with immediate connectivity in STRUC-PERC-I and transitional admissibility in STRUC-I. |
| route_class_code | FULL_PERCOLATION | 1 | 0.01 | Structural Boundary | Transitional Structure | 0.9194 | 0.898 | 0.890238 | Route-role topology fully percolates and is the strongest STRUC-I encoding by mean Aκ. This is the cleanest current representation of the charge-boundary corpus. |

STRUC-PERC-I Findings
---------------------
The STRUC-PERC-I batch result divides the six encodings into two groups.

1. Fragmenting charge-value encodings:
   - signed_charge: HARD_FRAGMENTATION (giant ratio = 0.857142857143, isolated = 1, kappa_connect = null)
   - absolute_charge: HARD_FRAGMENTATION (giant ratio = 0.75, isolated = 1, kappa_connect = null)

2. Fully percolating route/closure encodings:
   - boundary_route_coordinate: FULL_PERCOLATION (giant ratio = 1, isolated = 0, kappa_connect = 1)
   - closure_class_code: FULL_PERCOLATION (giant ratio = 1, isolated = 0, kappa_connect = 1)
   - closure_state_code: FULL_PERCOLATION (giant ratio = 1, isolated = 0, kappa_connect = 0.01)
   - route_class_code: FULL_PERCOLATION (giant ratio = 1, isolated = 0, kappa_connect = 0.01)

Interpretation:
    Bare electric charge value does not form a globally connected ladder.
    UNNS route and closure representations do.

STRUC-I Findings
----------------
STRUC-I classified all six ABCD encodings as:

    Regime: Structural Boundary
    State:  Transitional Structure

This is important because STRUC-I does not say that the route/closure
encodings are trivially stable. Even when STRUC-PERC-I reports full
percolation, STRUC-I keeps the corpus in a boundary regime.

The strongest STRUC-I encoding by mean Aκ is:

    ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_route_class_code
    mean_Aκ = 0.9194
    min_Aκ  = 0.898
    mean rho = 0.890238

The weakest STRUC-I encoding by mean Aκ is:

    ABCD_charge_boundary_ladder_signed_charge
    mean_Aκ = 0.657413
    min_Aκ  = 0.5845
    mean rho = 0.976987

This matches the STRUC-PERC-I result: route-class structure is coherent,
while raw signed charge is fragile.

UNNS Interpretation
-------------------
The combined result supports the Phase 1 working hypothesis:

    External observability requires charge-boundary closure.
    Fractional charge is permitted as an internal route coordinate.
    Composite states route fractional internal coordinates into integer
    or neutral external closure.
    Boundary absences and constraints mark failed or forbidden externalization.

The key empirical pattern is not merely that certain charge values exist.
The key pattern is that the charge corpus coheres only after charge values
are lifted into a route/closure representation.

What Can Be Claimed Now
-----------------------
Supported by Phase 1 chamber evidence:

1. Bare signed charge fragments in STRUC-PERC-I.
2. Absolute charge also fragments in STRUC-PERC-I.
3. Boundary-route, closure-class, closure-state, and route-class encodings
   fully percolate in STRUC-PERC-I.
4. All six encodings remain Structural Boundary / Transitional Structure
   under STRUC-I.
5. The charge corpus is therefore representation-sensitive: it is fragmented
   as a value projection and connected as a route/closure structure.

Not yet claimed:

1. This is not yet a final law of electric charge.
2. This is not yet a derivation of charge quantization.
3. This does not yet prove confinement.
4. This does not yet replace gauge theory or Standard Model charge assignments.

Operational Consequence
-----------------------
For later phases, signed_charge and absolute_charge should be retained as
control encodings. They are useful precisely because they fragment.

Primary encodings for the next stage should be:

    boundary_route_coordinate
    closure_class_code
    route_class_code

The next empirical question is no longer simply:

    What are the charge values?

It becomes:

    Which route/closure encodings preserve admissibility under deformation,
    bridge tests, and expanded particle/composite corpora?

Next Step
---------
Proceed to a Phase 1B comparison focused on layer-resolved behavior:

    Layer A: primitive external integer/neutral closures
    Layer B: confined fractional coordinates
    Layer C: composite closures
    Layer D: boundary absences / constraints

Recommended next outputs:

    outputs/reports/phase1_layer_resolved_plan.txt
    results/struc_perc_i/layer_resolved/
    results/struc_i/layer_resolved/

File Placement
--------------
Save this report as:

    charge_boundary_routing_i/
    └── outputs/
        └── reports/
            └── phase1_chamber_comparison_report.txt

Supporting result files:

    results/struc_perc_i/
        ABCD_all_encodings_STRUC_PERC_I_v2_5_0_batch_results.csv
        ABCD_all_encodings_STRUC_PERC_I_v2_5_0_batch_results.json

    results/struc_i/
        chamber_struc_i_v1_0_4_results_ABCD_all_encodings.json
        chamber_struc_i_v1_0_4_profiles_ABCD_all_encodings.csv
