UNNS Chamber Instrumentation Array

🧭 Navigation Guide — Understanding the Five-Chamber Progression

What is this array?

This is the complete geometric ladder from dimensional constraint through curvature sensitivity to metric stratification. The five chambers form a coherent progression: LI establishes interaction dimensionality, LII establishes boundary geometry responsiveness, LIII–LIV establish partition invariance, and LV proves hierarchical non-isometry.

The Complete Geometric Progression

Chamber LI — Dimensional Interaction Constraint Pairwise gate compositions (V-4 × V-5) exhibit non-additive interaction geometry covering 56% of parameter space. Triple compositions collapse: systematic relaxation increases coverage to 83.3% while reducing residual interaction magnitude by 43%. Finding: interaction geometry exists in dimension n ≤ 2 only.
Chamber LII — Curvature-Responsive Bifurcation Bifurcation admissibility depends nonlinearly on curvature deformation κ. Under systematic deformation, admissibility partitions remain intact while boundary geometry shifts in a curvature-dependent manner. Finding: curvature shifts boundaries, not partition identity.
Chamber LIII — Local Structural Completeness 56,877 mechanisms · adversarial single-gate relaxation · δmax = 0.239. All residual failure modes collapse into a single basin at the G3 bifurcation boundary. Finding: no hidden mechanism classes beyond the four-gate factorization.
Chamber LIV — Factorization Robustness Four perturbation families {P1–P4} with identity-preserving witness tracking. R2 = R3 = 0 throughout all perturbations. G3 parametric sensitivity under P1 (encoding) classified as boundary thinness, not structural failure. Finding: factorization survives perturbation.
Chamber LV — Hierarchical Non-Isometry Three Tier-2 families at τ₂ ∈ {0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9}. Decision B confirmed via two independent signals: normalization null (Δ = 0.0000) and slope stratification (R5-T slopes −0.11 to −0.14 for V2×V4). R2 = R3 = 0 throughout. Finding: partitions preserved, geometry stratified.

1. The structural ladder — from constraint to stratification

The progression is not accidental. LI establishes geometric constraint, LII establishes curvature sensitivity, LIII–LIV establish partition invariance, and LV reveals that invariance is structural (partition-level) but not geometric (metric-level). Non-isometry is the natural culmination of pre-metric geometric asymmetry elevated to a metric theorem.

2. The LV empirical structure — Decision B

Preregistered Protocol — Dual-Track Design Three Tier-2 families (V2×V3, V2×V4, V6×V7) at τ₂ ∈ {0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9}, N = 2000 per family, dual-track (raw / encoding-invariant normalized). Decision B confirmed — both preregistered criteria triggered independently: B1 — V2×V4 still fails at R1 = 0.70 after normalization, Δ(passRate) = 0.0000 exactly; B2 — V2×V4 R5-T slopes −0.11 to −0.14 (2–3× steeper than stable families), |Δs| = 0.0000. R2 = R3 = 0.0000 throughout all families and all τ₂ levels — channel orthogonality preserved.
Falsifier: uniform R5-T slopes across operator families.

3. Structural vs. parametric — the key distinction introduced by LIV

R1 failure alone (when R2, R3, R4 pass) indicates boundary thinness, not channel collapse. Structural stability requires R2 = R3 = 0. A framework conflating R1 failure with structural failure would incorrectly declare factorization broken when only projection geometry is stressed. This distinction is essential for correctly reading LV retention erosion in V2×V4.

4. The normalization null — Decision Criterion B1

The encoding hypothesis (Interpretation A) predicted that normalization maps dk_rel, B_rel, L_rel would restore V2×V4 retention to passing levels by absorbing curvature-induced scale drift. The prediction failed: Δ(passRate) = 0.0000 across all gates and all τ₂ levels — not approximately zero, exactly zero to six decimal places. This is a structural null: the normalization maps rescale thresholds proportionally with pool-level statistics, leaving pass/fail classification invariant. Interpretation A is falsified; Interpretation B (structural stratification) is confirmed.

5. Three geometric strata (LV Corollary 7.1.1)

Isometric stratum — F1 (V2×V3): |si| ≤ 0.029 for all gates Lift is metrically near-isometric. Partition and geometry both stable.
Mild erosion stratum — F3 (V6×V7): |si| ≤ 0.087 for all gates Intermediate position. Not stability, not stratification. |sG4| = 0.087 suggests a continuous spectrum of geometric stability indexed by operator tier structure.
Non-isometric stratum — F2 (V2×V4): |si| ≥ 0.113 for G2, G3, G4 Curvature augmentation causes systematic boundary erosion. Staged degradation: projection stress (τ₂ = 0.1–0.3) → projection failure (0.5–0.7) → breakdown onset (0.9, R4 = 0.1235). Partition survives. Geometry does not lift uniformly.

6. Categorical formulation (Theorem 8.1)

The Tier-2 lift functor LFτ₂ on the witness-channel category ChanF (four channel objects with Lawvere-metric enrichment dτ₂(i,i) = 1 − ρi) is the identity on channel objects — R2 = R3 = 0, no cross-channel transport — but is not an isometry in the Lawvere-metric enriched sense: self-distances dτ₂(i,i) change as witnesses are lost. Object-class preservation and metric distortion are provably independent. Witness migration (R4 > 0) is compatible with Part 1: migrated witnesses change the weight on a channel object without changing the object itself.

7. Critical Erosion Law and kernel-predictive non-isometry

Theorem 9.1 (Critical Erosion Law): under R2 = R3 = 0 and a critical retention model, migration onset τθmig ≥ τc + (θ/A(F))1/p(F). Theorem 9.2: the family Lipschitz constant LF is bounded by the curvature functional C(F) = maxi(BF · λi · Si), computed from kernel bias amplitude and boundary density prior to chamber execution. Hierarchical stratification is not merely observable — it is predictable.

8. What you may and may not conclude

✓ Valid conclusions (chain passes) Interaction geometry is dimensionally constrained (n ≤ 2); curvature shifts boundaries; factorization is necessary (not contingent); four channels are well-founded within characterized domain; factorization survives perturbation (LIV); factorization survives operator tier change as structure (LV); admissibility geometry is family-dependent under lift; V2×V4 failure is structural, not encoding artifact.
✗ Invalid conclusions Exactly four channels are globally necessary; Tier-2 geometry is uniformly transferable; a fifth independent gate would falsify factorization (it indicates invariant refinement or model extension); Chamber LV is broken or should be revised; Option C (projection-space reformulation) is part of LV.

🧭 Experimental Context — Characterized Domain

🔬 Pre-Metric Geometric Precursors — Dimensional Constraint · Curvature Sensitivity
CHAMBER LI-P₁
Role: Phase P₁ Execution — Boundary Mapping & Interaction
Phase P₁ Execution
Boundary Mapping
Exhaustive Phase P₁ execution layer for Axis V admissibility gates. Establishes baseline boundary mapping and interaction structure prior to dimensional analysis. Provides the operational substrate for pairwise and triple composition testing in LI-P₁-B and LI-P₁-C.
Phase P₁ execution complete · Axis V gates validated · Boundary structure mapped · Interaction geometry substrate established
Phase P₁ Axis V gates Boundary mapping
Feeds: LI-P₁-B Feeds: LI-P₁-C
✓ Phase P₁ execution complete. Boundary structure and interaction substrate mapped.
◆ Execution Layer · P₁
CHAMBER LI-P₁-B
Role: Interaction Geometry Analysis
V-Gate Interaction
Geometry
Pairwise gate composition analysis (V-4 × V-5) revealing non-additive interaction geometry. Quantifies interaction magnitude Δ(V-4 × V-5) = 0.580, covering 56% of parameter space with Cohen's κ = 0.309. Establishes that pairwise compositions sustain independent interaction structure.
Pairwise composition V-4 × V-5 · Δ = 0.580 · Coverage 56% · Cohen's κ = 0.309 · Non-additive interaction geometry confirmed
Δ(V-4 × V-5) = 0.580 Coverage 56% Cohen's κ = 0.309
Requires: LI-P₁ ✓ Feeds: LI Theorem
✓ Pairwise compositions exhibit non-additive interaction geometry. Independent structure sustained in dimension n = 2.
◆ Pairwise Analysis · P₁-B
CHAMBER LI-P₁-C
Role: Multi-Axis Interaction Geometry
Dimensional Collapse
Triple Compositions
Triple-gate composition analysis revealing dimensional collapse at n = 3. Systematic relaxation increases coverage to 83.3% while reducing residual interaction magnitude by 43%. Exclusion geometry vanishes. Establishes that higher-order composition removes curvature rather than amplifying it.
Triple composition collapse · Coverage increases to 83.3% · Residual interaction magnitude reduced by 43% · Exclusion geometry vanishes · Dimensional constraint n ≤ 2 confirmed
Triple compositions Coverage 83.3% Residual −43%
Requires: LI-P₁ ✓ Feeds: LI Theorem Falsifier: stable 3D residual
✓ Theorem 3.1 (LI): Admissibility interaction geometry exists in dimension n ≤ 2 and collapses in n = 3 compositions. Higher-order composition removes curvature.
◆ Dimensional Constraint · P₁-C
CHAMBER LII · v1.3.2
Role: Curvature-Responsive Bifurcation Dynamics
SAIF Phase P₃
Curvature Bifurcation
Curvature-responsive bifurcation boundary testing. Bifurcation admissibility depends nonlinearly on curvature deformation κ. Under systematic deformation, admissibility partitions remain intact while boundary geometry shifts in a curvature-dependent manner. Establishes that curvature alters boundary position without altering partition identity — a geometric (not combinatorial) phenomenon.
Curvature-responsive bifurcation confirmed · Partitions preserved under deformation · Boundary geometry shifts nonlinearly · Geometric (not combinatorial) phenomenon · Encoding-corrected v1.3.2
Phase P₃ Curvature κ deformation Partition-preserving v1.3.2 encoding fix
Feeds: LV Falsifier: partition/boundary coupling
✓ Theorem 3.2 (LII): Curvature deformation alters admissibility boundary position without altering partition identity. Boundaries shift, channels do not.
◆ Curvature Sensitivity · v1.3.2
🔬 Partition Invariance Layer — Completeness · Robustness
CHAMBER LIII · v3.1.0
Role: Local Structural Completeness Probe
P₄ Completeness
Modular
Adversarial single-gate relaxation across 56,877 mechanisms tests whether the gate set {G1, G2, G3, G4} exhausts admissibility channels within the characterized domain. All residual failure modes collapse into a single unified basin at the G3 bifurcation boundary (δmax = 0.239 < 0.5). G3 concentrates 73–89% of stress-profile residuals, reflecting that bifurcation capability captures the critical transition dimension. The modular v3.1.0 architecture separates gap analysis, cluster topology, and gate independence into independently auditable sub-protocols, each re-runnable without contaminating others. Emits a JSON v0.1.0 completeness verdict for downstream chamber ingestion.
Basin unification · δmax = 0.239 < 0.5 · No fifth independent channel within domain · G3 concentrates 73–89% of residuals · Single-gate witness behavior per gate confirmed · JSON completeness verdict (schema v0.1.0)
56,877 mechanisms δmax = 0.239 Single-gate relaxation Modular engine v3.1.0
Chain: LIV ↓ Chain: LV ↓ Output: JSON v0.1.0 Falsifier: WH ∉ G
✓ Theorem 4.1 (Local Structural Completeness): Gate set G exhausts admissibility channels within characterized domain. No additional independent gate H exists such that G ∪ {H} is witness-separable.
◆ Completeness Certified · Modular v3.1.0
CHAMBER LIV · v1.1.0
Role: Factorization Robustness Probe
Witness-Separability
Robustness
Four perturbation families {P1, P2, P3, P4} applied with full identity-preserving witness tracking — same mechanism IDs held constant across baseline and all perturbed pools. Channel overlap (R2) and dual-unlock interference (R3) remain zero throughout all perturbation types and strengths, confirming that witness-separability and factorization are not artifacts of the unperturbed regime. G3 R1 drops below 0.70 under P1 (encoding perturbation) only — classified as encoding-sensitive boundary thinness, not structural failure. Introduces the critical distinction carried into LV: structural stability (R2, R3, R4 jointly) is independent of parametric robustness (R1).
R2 = 0 · R3 = 0 · throughout all perturbation families and strengths · G3 parametric sensitivity under P1 (encoding): boundary thin but intact · Structural stability ≠ parametric robustness — separation confirmed
4 perturbation families {P1–P4} R2 = R3 = 0 throughout Identity-preserving IDs R1–R4 metric suite
Requires: LIII ✓ Feeds: LV R2 = R3 = 0 Falsifier: R2 or R3 > 0
✓ Theorem 5.1 (Factorization Robustness): Witness-separability and channel orthogonality preserved under all four perturbation families. G3 encoding sensitivity (P1) classified as parametric, not structural.
✓ Robustness Certified · v1.1.0
🔬 Metric Stratification Layer — Hierarchical Non-Isometry
CHAMBER LV · v1.1.0
Role: Tier-2 Selective Transfer · Projection Non-Isometry Diagnostic
Tier-2 Selective Transfer &
Hierarchical Non-Isometry
Identity-preserving Tier-2 lift of families V2×V3, V2×V4, V6×V7 at τ₂ ∈ {0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9}, N = 2000 per family. Dual-track: Run A (raw) vs Run B (encoding-invariant normalized via dk_rel, B_rel, L_rel). Decision B (Selective Transfer) confirmed via two independent preregistered signals: B1 — V2×V4 fails at R1 = 0.70 after normalization, Δ(passRate) = 0.0000 exactly (encoding hypothesis falsified — structural null); B2 — V2×V4 R5-T slopes −0.11 to −0.14 for G2/G3/G4 (2–3× steeper than stable families, |Δs| = 0.0000). R2 = R3 = 0.0000 throughout all families and all τ₂ levels. Staged V2×V4 degradation: projection stress → projection failure → breakdown onset (R4 = 0.1235 at τ₂ = 0.9) while channel orthogonality is maintained throughout. Three geometric strata identified.
Decision B — B1 and B2 both triggered · R2 = R3 = 0.0000 throughout · Δ(passRate) = 0.0000 (normalization null — structural, not power) · V2×V4 slopes: G2 −0.143, G3 −0.112, G4 −0.113 · R4 = 0.1235 at τ₂=0.9 · Strata: isometric (V2×V3) · mild erosion (V6×V7) · non-isometric (V2×V4)
3 Tier-2 families τ₂ ∈ {0.1–0.9} Δ(passRate) = 0.0000 R5-T stratification Staged degradation Lawvere-metric ChanF
Requires: LI, LII, LIII, LIV ✓ Terminal: Arc Closed R2 = R3 = 0 Falsifier: uniform slopes
✓ Theorem 6.1 (Projection Non-Isometry): Admissibility partitions preserved under all Tier-2 lifts (R2 = R3 = 0); admissibility geometry not uniformly metric-preserving across families. Lift functor = identity on channel objects · non-isometric in Lawvere-metric ChanF · hierarchical non-isometry is structural, not an encoding artifact. Predictable from kernel geometry via curvature functional C(F).
✓ Decision B · Arc Closed · v1.1.0

🔗 Complete Geometric Progression — LI → LII → LIII → LIV → LV

  Chamber LI    ──  What is interaction dimensionality?
       ↓               Pairwise (V-4 × V-5): Δ = 0.580, coverage 56%, Cohen's κ = 0.309
       ↓               Triple compositions: collapse to 83.3% coverage, residual −43%
       ↓               Theorem 3.1: Interaction geometry exists in dimension n ≤ 2 and collapses at n = 3.
       │               Falsifier: stable triple-gate residual — not found.
       │
  Chamber LII   ──  Does curvature shift boundaries?
       ↓               SAIF Phase P₃ · curvature-responsive bifurcation · partition-preserving
       ↓               Theorem 3.2: Curvature deformation alters boundary position without altering
       │               partition identity. Boundaries shift, channels do not.
       │               Falsifier: partition change under deformation — not observed.
       │
  Chamber LIII  ──  Are there hidden mechanism classes?
       ↓               56,877 mechanisms · adversarial relaxation · δmax=0.239 · basin unification at G3
       ↓               Theorem 4.1: No additional independent gate H within characterized domain.
       │               Falsifier: mechanism class WH unlocked by fifth gate — not found.
       │
  Chamber LIV   ──  Does factorization survive perturbation?
       ↓               4 perturbation families · R2 = R3 = 0 throughout · G3 parametric (P1 only)
       ↓               Theorem 5.1: Witness-separability and channel orthogonality preserved.
       │               Falsifier: non-zero R2 or R3 — not observed.
       │
  Chamber LV    ──  Does factorization survive operator tier change?
                      3 Tier-2 families · dual-track · τ₂ sweep · R5-T slope stratification
                      Theorem 6.1: Partitions preserved (R2=R3=0). Geometry non-isometric (V2×V4).
                      Decision B: B1 triggered (Δ=0.0000) · B2 triggered (slopes −0.11 to −0.14).
                      Critical Erosion Law + kernel-predictive curvature functional C(F).
                      Falsifier: uniform R5-T slopes — not observed.

  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
  Interaction geometry is dimensionally constrained.  Curvature shifts boundaries.
  Factorization exists and persists under perturbation.
  Under operator tier change, it survives as structure while stratifying as geometry.
  CHAMBER LV CERTIFIED.  GEOMETRIC PROGRESSION LI → LII → LIII → LIV → LV CLOSED.
  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

The progression is not accidental. LI establishes geometric constraint, LII establishes curvature sensitivity, LIII–LIV establish partition invariance, and LV reveals that invariance is structural (partition-level) but not geometric (metric-level). Non-isometry is the natural culmination of pre-metric geometric asymmetry elevated to a metric theorem. Do not revise LV. Open projection-space reformulation (Option C) as a new chamber with its own preregistered protocol if warranted.