Collapse Universality & Pre-Regularity Diagnostics

Empirical instrumentation for τ-energy, collapse stability, and descriptor-level emergence

Pre-Regularity Theory Collapse Universality τ-Energy Instrumentation UNNS Research Collective (2025)

This dashboard is a theory-bound instrumentation surface supporting the paper "Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate." It organizes selected UNNS chambers by functional role—calibration and pre-regularity probing—to test how structural persistence and universality arise prior to geometry, smoothness, or PDE-based regularity.

⚗️ Chamber Instrumentation Array

Calibration chambers and pre-regularity probes organized by functional role – v0.8.0

Phase C v0.8.0
📖 Help — How to Use This Dashboard

Collapse Universality & Pre-Regularity Instrumentation

Reference Paper:
"Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate — From Class-Level Uniqueness to Quantitative Stability"
📄 View PDF

This dashboard is built to accompany and instrument the reference paper. Use the paper as the canonical definitions layer; use the dashboard as the instrumentation and evidence layer.

1. What this dashboard is for

This dashboard is not a general UNNS lab index.

It is a theory-bound instrumentation surface created to support and explain the paper: "Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate"

Its purpose is to help users understand:

  • how τ-energy is operationalized,
  • how collapse (Operator XII) is realized in practice,
  • how descriptor-level stability and universality are empirically probed,
  • and how certain structures (e.g. μ★ ≈ φ) qualify as emergent, not tuned.

This dashboard organizes selected chambers by functional role, not by completeness or chronology.

2. Two kinds of chambers: why they are grouped

You will see chambers grouped under two headings:

⚙️ Calibration Chambers
These chambers define measurement infrastructure. They answer:
  • What is τ-energy in practice?
  • How are admissibility constraints enforced?
  • How is τcrit chosen?
They do not demonstrate universality or emergence by themselves.
Example: Chamber XXVIII — τ-Energy Calibration
🔍 Pre-Regularity Probe Chambers
These chambers test theoretical claims using the calibrated infrastructure. They answer:
  • Does collapse produce stable seed classes?
  • Are descriptor values locally contractive?
  • Do dispersive dynamics destroy stability?
  • Is an observed attractor robust or tuned?
Examples: Chamber XIV (local attractor), Chamber XV (dispersive coupling)

3. Where is "Chamber XII" (Collapse)?

⚠️ This is a common point of confusion.

There is no standalone file named "Chamber XII".

Instead: Operator XII (Collapse) is implemented as an embedded layer inside the UNNS Empirical Lab (unns-lab_v0.4.2.html).

In practical terms, this embedded Chamber XII is the logic that:

  • evaluates τ-energy or equivalent mismatch,
  • compares it to τcrit,
  • terminates unstable recursion,
  • reseeds admissible structures.

This collapse layer is pre-physical and pre-geometric. All downstream analyses (constants, spectra, plots) occur after collapse.

4. How to read a chamber card

Each chamber card contains three layers of information:

(a) Role ribbon — indicates why the chamber is here:

  • τ-Energy Calibration
  • Local Attractor Probe
  • Dispersive Coupling Probe
  • Collapse Enforcement Probe

(b) Diagnostic annotations — measured or inferred properties:

  • Δ″(μ★) > 0 · Local basin confirmed
  • LCloc ≈ 0.4 (contractive regime)
  • Coupled: XII / XV

(c) Status / Emergence badges — epistemic status:

  • ✓ COMPLETE — implementation finished
  • ✓ Emergent (robust) — persists under parameter perturbations
  • ⚠ Robustness sweep pending — do not treat as emergent yet

Only probe chambers can receive an Emergent badge.

5. The Pre-Regularity Diagnostics panel

This panel (top of page) declares the global experimental context:

  • how τ-energy is aggregated (weights),
  • how τcrit is calibrated,
  • which variables define the descriptor space,
  • whether local contractivity is expected,
  • whether emergence testing is active.

These settings apply to all chambers below unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Note: Weight sequence parameters (e.g., N for finite horizon) are matched to chamber-specific recursion depths. The paper permits multiple canonical families (§16.1); chambers declare their choice explicitly.

6. How the chambers work together

The paper's logic is not "one chamber proves everything". Instead:

Chamber XXVIII
  ↓ defines τ-energy and τcrit
Operator XII (embedded)
  ↓ collapse selects admissible structures
Chamber XIV
  ↓ tests local descriptor contraction
Chamber XV
  ↓ tests dispersive stability

Universality and emergence claims are valid only if stability survives this entire chain.

7. What you may and may not conclude

✓ You may conclude:
  • collapse is τ-energy–driven and observer-independent,
  • descriptor-level universality exists,
  • certain attractors are locally stable and robust,
  • regularity emerges before geometry or PDEs.
✗ You may not conclude:
  • physical constants are predicted,
  • continuum equations are derived,
  • smoothness or probability is fundamental.

Those are downstream interpretations, not substrate claims.

8. How to use this dashboard as a reader of the paper

  1. Read the Pre-Regularity Diagnostics panel first
  2. Identify which chambers are calibration vs probe
  3. Follow collapse → stability → dispersion logic
  4. Treat chamber outputs as empirical probes, not proofs
  5. Use the dashboard as a live appendix, not a substitute for the paper

9. Paper-Dashboard Relationship

Paper = definitions and claims. Qualitative universality (Theorem 1), quantitative stability (Theorem 2), operational closure (Section 16), emergence vs tuning criteria (Definition 10).

Dashboard = measurements and probes. Chamber XXVIII instantiates Δ(Sn), Operator XII enforces collapse, Chamber XIV provides empirical signature for local contraction, Chamber XV probes dispersive coupling.

The dashboard should be read as a live appendix to the reference paper.

Summary (one sentence):
This dashboard shows how collapse is measured, where stability appears, and which structures survive τ-energy filtering, providing empirical support for collapse universality and pre-regularity in the UNNS Substrate.

Reference: "Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate — From Class-Level Uniqueness to Quantitative Stability" [PDF]

🧭 Pre-Regularity Diagnostics

⚙️ Calibration Chambers
CHAMBER XXVIII
Role: τ-Energy Calibration
Phase D.3 Extended Validation Suite
Operationalizes abstract τ-energy through explicit admissibility filters and penalty-based mismatch. Instantiates Eτ as measurable survivability budget. Computes τcrit via quantile calibration.
✓ COMPLETE
🔍 Pre-Regularity Probe Chambers
CHAMBER XII
Role: Collapse Enforcement Probe
Empirical Testing Chamber
Tests collapse universality axioms through deterministic simulations. Validates that Operator XII maps supercritical structures to unique seed classes with Eτ(C(S)) < τcrit.
Coupled: XIV Coupled: XV
✓ COMPLETE
CHAMBER XIV
Role: Local Attractor Probe
Φ-Scale
Probes descriptor-level consequences of τ-energy budget by exposing preferred scale μ★ ≈ φ ≈ 1.618 as unique minimizer of scale-mismatch functional Δscale(μ).
Δ″(μ★) > 0 · Local basin confirmed · LCloc ≈ 0.4 (contractive regime)
Coupled: XII Coupled: XV
✓ Emergent (robust)
CHAMBER XV
Role: Dispersive Coupling Probe
Prism
Examines dispersive β-coupling regime (LC(β) > 1) through spectral analysis. Validates that contractive collapse (XII/XIV) and dispersive dynamics coexist as complementary substrate regimes.
Coupled: XII Coupled: XIV
✓ COMPLETE