⚙️ CHAMBER XXIX: PROTO-CLOSURE

L2 Structural Evaluation – Deterministic RNG (v0.2.6 FINAL)
Evaluation Controls
Mechanism Evaluation Results
No evaluations run yet. Click "Run Reference Suite" to test control mechanisms.
📚 Design Documentation
🔽 Chamber XXIX: Proto-Closure Evaluation Engine (v0.2.6) – Click to expand

Chamber XXIX: Proto-Closure Evaluation

v0.2.6 Update (Deterministic RNG - Reproducibility Fix): All non-deterministic Math.random() calls have been replaced with seeded PRNG (Mulberry32). Each mechanism receives a deterministic seed based on its ID and configuration. This ensures exact reproducibility of all results and fixes the TEST-BALANCED-PARENS transient annotation inconsistency. The seed is exported in verdict JSON for perfect replay across machines.
v0.2.5 Update (Meta-Instability Transient Detector): Meta-instability is now detected as a transient phenomenon, not a terminal verdict class. The verdict system is binary: PROTO-CLOSED | STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE. Transient recurrence is captured as diagnostic metadata without overriding collapse verdicts. This preserves falsifiability and reflects the empirical finding that meta-instability does not survive structural refinement.
v0.2.0 Update (Fix A - Windowed Trajectory): Structural state now captures a windowed trajectory of configurations (default: 8 steps) rather than a single terminal configuration. This enables detection of oscillatory dynamics that occur in rule-time, not just refinement-time. Critical for mechanisms like binary flip (A↔B) where period-2 orbit exists within generation steps but was previously hidden by single-snapshot sampling.
Critical Constraint: This chamber operates purely on symbolic/structural level (L2). It never evaluates numbers, never tests values, and never searches for constants. All verdicts are based on structural recurrence under refinement.

1. Purpose & Scope

Chamber XXIX evaluates mechanisms for proto-closure via structural recurrence under refinement.

Out of scope (hard exclusions):

  • Numerical constants evaluation
  • Numeric field evolution (τ-fields, etc.)
  • Value convergence, divergence, or stability
  • Matching against known constants (φ, π, e, √2)

2. Mechanism Definition

Each mechanism M = (Σ, R, C, O) consists of:

  • Σ: Finite symbolic alphabet (opaque tokens)
  • R: Rewrite/generation rules (symbolic transformations only)
  • C: Admissibility constraints (decidable on symbolic structures)
  • O: Operator schedule (ordering of rule application)

3. Structural Equivalence Metric (v0.2)

Two-level metric on windowed trajectories:

  1. Canonical Hash (primary): Deterministic hash of canonicalized trajectory
    • Window = last W configurations from generation (default W=8)
    • Alpha-renaming normalization across window
    • Period detection within window
    • Symbol order normalization
    • If hashes match → d = 0
  2. Feature Vector Distance (secondary): When hashes differ
    • Extract from entire window: symbol histograms, diversity, patterns
    • Compute L1 distance between feature vectors
    • Includes: avg config length, inter-config variation, compressibility
    • Normalized to avoid scale bias

Key Advantage: Windowed approach captures temporal structure (oscillations, cycles) that single-snapshot canonicalization would miss. Essential for detecting proto-closure in mechanisms with rule-level periodicity.

4. Refinement Process

For each mechanism, generates sequence S₀ → S₁ → S₂ → ... where each step applies refinement:

  • Increased generation depth (multiplicative: 20 → 40 → 80 → ...)
  • Tightened constraints (if applicable)
  • Reduced equivalence tolerance

5. Closure Detection

Structural Closure Criterion: A mechanism exhibits structural closure iff:

  • ∃ ε > 0 and k ≥ 1 such that for sufficiently large n: d(Sₙ, Sₙ₊ₖ) < ε
  • AND recurrent orbit contains > 1 equivalence class (non-trivial)
  • AND recurrence persists to terminal refinement level

Excluded from closure:

  • Fixed-point freezing (single state orbit)
  • Transient recurrence (detected but collapses under refinement)
  • Null collapse
  • Exhaustion termination

6. Verdict System (v0.2.5 – Binary Classification)

Verdict Meaning
PROTO-CLOSED Structural closure detected and persists under refinement
STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE No persistent recurrence detected, or structure degenerates
Meta-Instability (Transient Annotation): Mechanisms showing temporary recurrence that fails under refinement receive STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE verdict with meta_instability.detected = true metadata. This distinguishes pure collapse (no recurrence) from transient mirages (temporary recurrence). The annotation includes: first/last refinement level, duration, and period of the transient orbit.

7. Reference Mechanism Library (Phase 1)

Control Mechanisms:

  • CTRL-BINARY-FLIP: Expected verdict: PROTO-CLOSED (period-2 orbit persists)
  • CTRL-UNBOUNDED-GROWTH: Expected verdict: STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE (unbounded growth, no recurrence)
  • CTRL-META-UNSTABLE: Expected verdict: STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE (transient period-3, then growth dominates)
    ⚠ Shows transient recurrence annotation

Test Mechanisms:

  • TEST-TERNARY-CYCLE: Expected verdict: PROTO-CLOSED (period-3 orbit persists)
  • TEST-BALANCED-PARENS: Expected verdict: STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE (constraints accelerate collapse)
    📌 Important negative result: constraints ≠ closure guarantee
⚠️ Validation Requirement: Chamber XXIX cannot be considered functional until all 5 reference mechanisms return their expected verdicts. This provides ground-truth calibration for the binary classification system.

8. Output Contract (v0.2.5)

Each mechanism receives JSON output with:

{
  "mechanism_id": "...",
  "alphabet_signature": "...",
  "rule_signature": "...",
  "constraint_signature": "...",
  "operator_schedule": "...",
  "metric_used": "canonical_hash + feature_vector_L1 (windowed)",
  "window_size": 8,
  "refinement_ladder": [...],
  "orbit_detected": true | false,
  "orbit_period": k | null,
  "orbit_signature": "...",
  "distinct_states": n | null,
  "verdict": "PROTO-CLOSED" | "STRUCTURAL-COLLAPSE",
  "failure_modes": [...],
  "meta_instability": {
    "detected": false | true,
    "first_level": null | n,
    "last_level": null | m,
    "max_duration": 0 | (m - n),
    "period": null | k
  },
  "elapsed_ms": ...,
  "expected_verdict": "..." | null,
  "validation_passed": true | false | null,
  "timestamp": "..."
}

9. Compliance Checklist

Chamber XXIX is compliant iff:

  • ✅ Never evaluates numbers
  • ✅ Never tests values
  • ✅ Never searches for constants
  • ✅ Never ranks mechanisms by numeric proximity
  • ✅ Reports only structural behavior
  • ✅ Binary verdict system (no ambiguous third class)
  • ✅ Meta-instability as annotation, not verdict override

Implementation Notes

Mechanism DSL

Rules (R):

{
  "pattern": ["A", "B"],
  "replacement": ["B", "A", "C"],
  "condition": null
}

Constraints (C):

[
  {"type": "max_length", "value": 100},
  {"type": "forbidden_substring", "value": ["A", "A", "A"]},
  {"type": "symbol_balance", "symbols": ["(", ")"], "balanced": true}
]

Feature Vector Components

  • Symbol frequency histogram (normalized)
  • Unique symbol count
  • Total length (windowed average)
  • Pattern diversity (unique 2-grams)
  • Compressibility estimate (run-length encoding ratio)
  • Inter-config variation (length variance across window)

Theoretical Alignment

This implementation strictly follows:

  • Definition 3 (Mechanism)
  • Definition 4 (Structural State)
  • Definition 5 (Refinement)
  • Definition 7 (Structural Closure)
  • Definition 9 (Proto-Closure)
  • Definition 11 (Structural Equivalence Metric)
  • Definition 12 (Refined Structural Closure)

Key Theoretical Findings

Empirical Result (v0.2.5): Meta-instability does not survive structural refinement in the UNNS substrate. Systems exhibiting transient recurrence ultimately collapse, demonstrating that meta-stability is a Phase-B phenomenological illusion rather than a fundamental ontological category.

Publishable Claim: Proto-closure is topology-determined, not numerology-determined. Mechanisms with persistent structural recurrence form a distinct class independent of alphabet size, numeric periodicity, or semantic interpretation.

Important Negative Result: Admissibility constraints do not guarantee structural closure. The balanced-parentheses mechanism demonstrates that constraints can actually accelerate collapse by destroying recurrence under refinement. Constraints ≠ stability.

Version: 0.2.6 FINAL | Layer: L2 (Structural) | Mode: Deterministic Seeded RNG | Status: Production Ready